Latest update and remove TLSv1.3 draft

crypto/bn/asm/ia64.S

@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@
 // on Itanium2! What to do? Reschedule loops for Itanium2? But then
 // Itanium would exhibit anti-scalability. So I've chosen to reschedule
 // for worst latency for every instruction aiming for best *all-round*
-// performance.  
+// performance.
 
 // Q.	How much faster does it get?
 // A.	Here is the output from 'openssl speed rsa dsa' for vanilla
@@ -471,7 +471,7 @@ bn_mul_add_words:
 .global	bn_sqr_words#
 .proc	bn_sqr_words#
 .align	64
-.skip	32	// makes the loop body aligned at 64-byte boundary 
+.skip	32	// makes the loop body aligned at 64-byte boundary
 bn_sqr_words:
 	.prologue
 	.save	ar.pfs,r2

crypto/bn/asm/sparcv8plus.S

@@ -154,9 +154,9 @@
   .register	%g2,#scratch
   .register	%g3,#scratch
 # define	FRAME_SIZE	-192
-#else 
+#else
 # define	FRAME_SIZE	-96
-#endif 
+#endif
 /*
  * GNU assembler can't stand stuw:-(
  */

crypto/bn/bn_ctx.c

@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static int BN_STACK_push(BN_STACK *st, unsigned int idx)
         unsigned int newsize =
             st->size ? (st->size * 3 / 2) : BN_CTX_START_FRAMES;
         unsigned int *newitems;
-        
+
         if ((newitems = OPENSSL_malloc(sizeof(*newitems) * newsize)) == NULL) {
             BNerr(BN_F_BN_STACK_PUSH, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
             return 0;
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@ static BIGNUM *BN_POOL_get(BN_POOL *p, int flag)
     /* Full; allocate a new pool item and link it in. */
     if (p->used == p->size) {
         BN_POOL_ITEM *item;
-        
+
         if ((item = OPENSSL_malloc(sizeof(*item))) == NULL) {
             BNerr(BN_F_BN_POOL_GET, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE);
             return NULL;