Latest update.

crypto/sha/asm/keccak1600-mmx.pl

@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 # produce worse code. On the other hand one can wonder why not 128-bit
 # SSE2? Well, SSE2 won't provide double improvement, rather far from
 # that, if any at all on some processors, because it will take extra
-# permutations and inter-bank data trasfers. Besides, contemporary
+# permutations and inter-bank data transfers. Besides, contemporary
 # CPUs are better off executing 64-bit code, and it makes lesser sense
 # to invest into fancy 32-bit code. And the decision doesn't seem to
 # be inadequate, if one compares below results to "64-bit platforms in
@@ -436,4 +436,4 @@ sub Rho() {				######### regular Rho step
 
 &asm_finish();
 
-close STDOUT;
+close STDOUT or die "error closing STDOUT";